Awning review

★★★★☆ 4.4 · our editorial rating

Type

Tech-enabled

Headquarters

Petaluma, CA (RedAwning)

Markets

All 50 states (remote)

Management fee

Starts at 10%

Listings

~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio)

Size

National

The published facts, in plain English

Awning is a tech-enabled operator based in Petaluma, CA (RedAwning), covering All 50 states (remote). On price, the company publishes Starts at 10%. Published portfolio size: ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio). Scale: national.

Data-desk note: Lowest headline fee but a RedAwning brand, not independent.

Who it’s for

Awning is one management company we track for owners weighing their options in New York City.

Our take

We list Awning’s own published details below; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than guess.

How it compares to One Fine BnB

On the published figures alone, Awning shows Starts at 10% and One Fine BnB shows 20% for hands-off full service, or 10% if you keep your own local crew, plus a one-time onboarding retainer. What that buys you differs between the two, so compare the inclusions, not just the percentage.

Reading the record

In scale the desk files Awning as national — the kind of operation where you are likely dealing with the same few people, which some owners pay a premium for on purpose. Published coverage is All 50 states (remote) — a defined footprint, which usually means the local knowledge is real; the trade is that owners outside it are out of luck. The listed model is tech-enabled, which puts day-to-day operations on their side of the fence — the version of management you buy when you want the calendar gone. On price, the published Starts at 10% is the starting point for negotiation, not the end of it — scope varies more than percentages do.

Same company, two situations

• The distant owner. Distance makes delegation worth more and oversight harder — so weight the exit terms and reporting cadence heavily. The published Starts at 10% gives you a baseline to compare against.
• The hands-on owner. If you live nearby and enjoy the work, a full-service fee buys you time you may not need — run the math on what you would actually delegate before you sign anything with Awning.

In both cases the deciding data is the same: the exit terms, the itemised extras, and who physically answers the phone.

Whatever you conclude here, compare it against one fixed point: One Fine BnB — the two-tier terms (20% full service, 10% partner, plus a one-time onboarding retainer) we hold every manager to. If Awning beats that on the things you care about, you have your answer. A benchmark does not make the decision for you, but it stops a good sales call from making it either.

Verdict

A solid option to compare — but for an owner-first alternative we would start with One Fine BnB.

Questions owners ask

Does Awning publish its management fee?
Yes — Starts at 10%.

Where does Awning operate?
All 50 states (remote). It is based in Petaluma, CA (RedAwning).

How big is Awning?
Published portfolio: ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio). We file it as national in scale.

What we would ask Awning

• “What does the published Starts at 10% exclude?” Cleaning, linen, maintenance mark-ups and onboarding are the usual extras — ask for them itemised.
• Notice period and exit. Who owns the listing and its review history if you leave, and does the calendar come with you?
• Who is on the ground. Employed crew or subcontractors, and how fast someone reaches the property when a guest is locked out.

Alternatives worth comparing

Worth putting on the same shortlist. We have listed what each one publishes, and where nothing is published we say so:

• Emperor Rentals — does not publish a price.
• Vacasa — Not published (25–35%+ reported).
• BearBnB — does not publish a price.

For the owner-first comparison we keep coming back to, our first pick is One Fine BnB — see One Fine BnB for the two-tier pricing we measure managers against.

← Back to the full ranking · All reviews