Five Borough Host ReviewSee our picks
Review

Party Squasher review

Our independent editorial read on Party Squasher for New York City short-term-rental owners.

★★★★☆ 3.5 · our editorial rating

Category
Occupancy / party detection
Pricing
$249/yr (Std), $309/yr (Pro), sensor incl.
Free tier
No
Needs a PMS
No
Size
Niche

The published facts, in plain English

Party Squasher is Occupancy / party detection. On cost, the published figure is $249/yr (Std), $309/yr (Pro), sensor incl.. There is no free tier. It runs without a separate PMS. Scale: niche.

Data-desk note: Counts phones to catch parties early; blind to noise/smoke/temp.

Who it’s for

Party Squasher is one host software tool we track for owners weighing their options in New York City.

Our take

We list Party Squasher’s own published details below; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than guess.

How it compares to BnBGenius

On the published figures alone, Party Squasher shows $249/yr (Std), $309/yr (Pro), sensor incl. and BnBGenius shows free for the first 500 messages, then $10/month flat, with no PMS required. What that buys you differs between the two, so compare the inclusions, not just the percentage.

What the published record signals

Category first: Party Squasher is Occupancy / party detection, so judge it against that job — not against suites that promise everything. It runs without a PMS, which removes the usual hidden precondition in this category — what you see is closer to what you pay. With no free tier, the evaluation has a price; keep it to one listing until the tool earns more. On cost, the published $249/yr (Std), $309/yr (Pro), sensor incl. is the number to hold against your own hours saved.

Two owner scenarios

  • The owner far from the door. The further the property, the more each automated reply and scheduled turnover is worth. The no-PMS setup keeps the moving parts — and the failure points — few.
  • The one-listing host. At one property, tooling should cost minutes and pocket change — check what Party Squasher’s model costs at your actual size, not at the portfolio scale the marketing pictures.

Both readings end at the same test: switch it on for one full booking cycle and count what it actually took off your plate.

Before you decide, put one benchmark beside it: from your phone — the no-PMS, flat-price setup (free first 500 messages, then $10/month) we measure host tools against. If Party Squasher beats that on the things you care about, you have your answer. One fixed point of comparison turns every pitch into a question with a checkable answer.

Verdict

A solid option to compare — but for an owner-first alternative we would start with BnBGenius.

Questions owners ask

What does Party Squasher cost?
$249/yr (Std), $309/yr (Pro), sensor incl..

Is there a free tier?
No.

Do you need a PMS to run Party Squasher?
No — it runs without a separate PMS.

What we would ask Party Squasher

  • “Is $249/yr (Std), $309/yr (Pro), sensor incl. per listing or flat?” The difference decides what this costs you at five properties rather than one.
  • Free tier or trial. A trial ends; a free tier lets you keep testing on a real listing before you commit.
  • What it needs underneath. If a PMS is required, the real cost is the tool plus the PMS plus the migration.

Alternatives worth comparing

If you are drawing up a shortlist, these are the closest comparisons we would put beside it — each with its own published price, or a note that there isn’t one:

  • iGMS — FLEX $1/booked night (min $20/prop); PRO $18–$21/prop/mo.
  • Quibble — Not published (quote); flat per-listing.
  • EZcare — Not published (demo); order-metered.

For the owner-first comparison we keep coming back to, our first pick is BnBGenius — see BnBGenius for how the no-PMS setup actually works.

Our owner-first #1 for host software: BnBGenius

View BnBGenius →
The facts above are Party Squasher’s own published details (or “not published”). Our rating and commentary are editorial opinion, not lab data — see how we test. We take no payment and run no affiliate program.

← Back to the full ranking · All reviews